We Don’t “Grow the Church”

Grow Church (600 x 337)Are any of you old enough to remember chalkboards in school? If so, you also remember the grating sound of fingernails going down that chalkboard. (It sets me on edge just writing about it). Well, if you know that feeling I’m talking about, then you also know the feeling I have every time I hear someone talk about “growing the church.”

You might be right in calling it a personal “pet peeve,” or even a scruple, but I believe I have good reason for not using such relatively new verbiage. Allow me to share a few reasons I think we ought to rethink the propriety of using this expression.

  1. Nowhere in Scripture can we see this language employed.  Weren’t they interested in church growth in the first century?  Of course they were.  But never do you read of Paul talking about how he “grew the church at Ephesus or Corinth. Peter didn’t write of the success of Pentecost by saying he had grown the church to 3000 members in one day.  On the contrary, what we read is that Paul planted, Apollos watered, but God gave the increase (1 Corinthians 3:6) which brings me to my next point.
  2. This verbiage takes credit for what we did not do.  God is the one who gives the increase.  Certainly we “plant” and “water,” but growth comes from God. I don’t “grow” the church, God does.  Can you imagine anyone saying, “See that young man over there? That’s my son I’ve grown.” We don’t talk like that.  Of course we fed and nourished him, but there’s a metabolic thing going on that is out of my control and that I have nothing to do with. Likewise with respect to the church, we may “plant” and “water,” but there’s a “regeneration” that is out of my control, and is the work of God (Titus 3:5).
  3. It sounds boastful and arrogant. As it should, for we’re taking credit for something we didn’t do.  I’m not saying that those who use this expression are arrogant, I’m suggesting they maybe haven’t thought it through. When I hear men talk about how they’ve “grown the church,” I can’t stop myself from quietly thinking, “wouldn’t it be better to give that credit to God, where it actually belongs?” When my youngest son was only three-years-old, he once asked me why people give “Mother Nature” credit for what God does? I thought it was a great question, especially from a three-year-old. Like my son, I want to ask the question why we would want to take credit for what God does?

Friends, I’m interested in church growth just as much as the next guy, but I think we ought to give greater care to the words we use. I want nothing more than to use my life to bring glory to God (Ephesians 3:21), and I want nothing less than to claim for myself glory that is rightfully God’s (Matthew 5:16). A more thoughtful use of our words may help us to fulfill both of those desires.  Give it some thought.

Share Button

Comments 10

  • Good thoughts. When I think of this, I’m reminded of the parable in Mark 4:26ff.

  • […] whole article can be read at this link. J. Randal Matheny Randal and his wife Vicki have lived and worked in Brazil since Nov. 1984. […]

  • I don’t wish to sound snide, but this seems to be splitting hairs. When we say that we need to grow the church, I don’t think anyone means that God has nothing to do with it. We pray that God will give us opportunities to teach. But we have to be the ones to study with people in an effort to lead them to Christ. We are the “earthen vessels” entrusted with the gospel to take to the whole world. For me, there is no difference in saying the church needs to grow and saying we need to grow the church.

  • Steve, you are absolutely right in your article.

  • Did you have a relative who preached in Grass Valley, CA in 1967?

  • Brother Steve, I agree with you 100%

  • Amen.

  • Sorry, but no. My family is from West Virginia.

  • Wayman, thank you for taking the time to reply.
    In your comments you said, “I don’t think anyone means that God has nothing to do with it.”
    My reply…I agree and wasn’t suggesting otherwise. I don’t believe, for the most part, those who use this expression do so arrogantly and mean to exclude God, but that is the unintended result. Why would one choose to use verbiage that excludes God from receiving glory, and inserts himself in his place? Please consider Mark 4:26-29 in this context. The farmer scatters seed and goes about his business. He doesn’t make the seed grow, nor does he know how it grows, but sure enough, there will be a spout, then a blade, then a head, and then a harvest. This farmer recognizes these matters were out of his control.
    I am not suggesting in this article that someone who uses this language is sinning. What I am suggesting is to give greater care with our language and use words that more accurately communicate the glory that belongs to God.

  • Great article….

%d bloggers like this: